Hillary’s latest ad against Barack Obama is a bit odd not so much because of what it says, but what it makes you think. Watch:

Who could possibly watch that and think of Hillary Clinton instead of John McCain? McCain’s fight against the FEC to allow him to spend more money isn’t going to much matter so long as Hillary is running free ads for him.

A New Hampshire landlord who rented property to the Hillary campaign for 5 days says that he hasn’t been paid, and no one will return his calls.

Rochester physician Terry Bennett said he rented a city building to people who worked for Sen. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign ? and skipped town without paying the bill.

Making matters worse, Bennett said, the 3,000-square-foot building at 236 Union St. was left trashed. Campaign signs were left lying all over the place, he said.

…Whitney, with the firm of Keller Williams Coastal Realty, confirmed the building was not left in good condition.

“We had to pick up after them,” he said.

…When the group did not give him a check for the amount up front, as per the agreement, Whitney said, he gave them the benefit of the doubt.

“But they packed up and left,” he said.

“They left enough trash for a small army,” said Bennett. “We filled two of those big black trash bags with what they left. There might still be a 4×8 Hillary sign there we pulled off the fence.”

Classy.

This is nothing new for the Clinton’s. Clinton staffers trashed the White House, and did $20,000 worth of damage, on their way out in 2001.^[1] The pattern is clear: whatever the Clinton’s occupy, they destroy. Let’s not give them another chance to trash America.

^[1] 2002. Allegations of Damage During the 2001 Presidential Transition. United States General Accounting Office, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02360.pdf.

Judicial Watch has released several explosive documents detailing some of the behind-the-scenes happenings during Hillary’s failed attempt to socialize healthcare. What they reveal is absolutely amazing and offers a look at what we can expect should Shrillary somehow manage to capture her Holy Grail.

A memo from Senator Jay Rockefeller to Hillary provides a number of response strategies to expected criticisms, and also offers some very revealing commentary on the media. Rockefeller scornfully identifies a number of different groups likely to criticism the initiative, including “deficit hawks,” “government bashers,” and “militant single-payers. He also recommends “exposing the lifestyles, tactics and motives of small business lobbyists” who, along with economics, he predicts will dare to point out the expected job losses. He also offers an unflattering portrayal of media, “News directors, planners and editors, and features producers and editors are anxious and willing to receive guidance on how to time and shape their coverage.”

Anxious to await guidance from democrats on how to shape their coverage?

What media bias?

Another internal memo offers a critique of the plan as well as some valuable insight into the mind of liberals.

There is more regulation in this plan that I expected to see, and I worry about the wisdom of much of it. The spirit and some of the substance contradict the idea of flexibility for states and room for variety, innovation, and competition.

…I can think of parallels in wartime, but I have trouble coming up with a precedent in our peacetime history for such broad and centralized control over a sector of the economy. Is the public really ready for this? The polls all show people think we should be spending more money on health care; of course, people don’t see how much health care is costing them.

Not seeing the true costs of health care is exactly why it costs so much in the first place, and something that big government liberals always count on. They want to convince you that their centralized solutions will be cheaper, but it’s a lie; you just won’t easily see how much it really costs.