At the recent Saddleback forum, where by almost all accounts McCain spanked Obama, the anointed one provided new fuel to critics regarding his complete and utter lack of qualifications.

Asked about judicial nominees, Obama stated that he would not have nominated Clarence Thomas because he didn’t have enough experience.  I kid you not.

“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas. I don’t think that he, I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of the Constitution.”

So what shows that Obama is a strong enough executive for elevation to the office of the Presidency?  Obama’s opinion of Thomas is laughable, especially coming from a man who was, by all accounts, an utterly undistinguished professor too scared to put his own opinions on paper.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS